Both Hilary Myers (Lib Dem) and Craig Whittaker (Con) were quick out of the blocks, acknowledging my enquiry within a matter of hours. Quite impressive: let’s not forget that the candidates have day jobs, too. However, the first substantive reply comes from Green candidate Kate Sweeny:
Dear Ian
Thank you for contacting me, and I apologise for the slight delay in responding. I have reproduced below the relevant section from the Green Party’s Education policy – you will see from this that we are very supportive of your choice.I hope this helps. Please feel free to contact me again if you have further questions.
Home-based Education: ED150 We support parents’ rights to educate their children in settings other than at school. ED151 Too often parents exercise this choice as a result of negative experiences such as children experiencing bullying, feeling restricted by the curriculum or intimidated by large schools and class sizes. The Green Party’s reform of the education system would alleviate many of these issues.
I sent the following response:
Dear Kate
Many thanks for your reply. I was hoping for a little more detail, I must admit. After all, Ed Balls insists that he too supports Home Education, and yet the proposals in the CSF Bill will have a disastrous effect if they do become law.
Having said that, does the lack of detail imply that the Greens have no intention to enact legislation affecting home education? The status quo is not ideal (largely due to Local Authorities’ inability to understand the existing law) but it is far more preferable to what the CSF bill offers. There is certainly no pressing need for change.
Best wishes
Ian
It was a bit of a rushed response, I suppose – I now wish I had mentioned something about home education often being a philosophical preference as opposed to “too often” being a response to difficulties in schools. Oh, well, there may yet be chance.
Update 30 March 2010:
Kate replies thus:
Hi Ian
I’m afraid I don’t know the answer to your question, so I’ve forwarded your message to our national policy team. they may reply to you directly.Best wishes, Kate
Well, that’s a result of sorts – anything that raises awareness of the threat to HE at national policy level can’t be a bad thing. I will of course blog what, if anything, they send. Thanks to Kate for her replies.

